News and views from the award-winning author of the novels The Skinny Years, America Libre, House Divided and Pancho Land

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

It’s time to go piecemeal on immigration reform

With the political winds blowing hard against the passage of comprehensive immigration reform, immigrant rights groups are considering a new approach: piecemeal legislation. According to the Washington Post, supporters of comprehensive immigration reform are going to a “Plan B” which will focus on passing two key bills.

The first bill is AgJobs, an agreement between farmworker unions and agriculture business groups hammered out more than five years ago that will provide legal farm labor while protecting the rights of immigrant workers.  Its common knowledge many farmworkers are undocumented immigrants. Yet only hardline nativists believe the nation has no need for these workers. (A recent call to unemployed Americans to “take our jobs” by the United Farmworkers Union has had four respondents—one of them political satirist Stephen Colbert.) A guest worker program like AgJobs will ensure the nation has critically needed labor while ensuring all farmworkers are paid above the table—with full tax deductions. It will also protect U.S. workers from the downward pressure on wages from exploitative employers who hire the undocumented and pay them below market wages.

The other piece of legislation moving to the front burner is the DREAM Act, a bill that would allow the best and the brightest children of undocumented immigrants to become more productive members of U.S. society. The law would apply to undocumented students of good moral character who arrived in the U.S. as minors and have been in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill's enactment. Under the DREAM Act, these young people would have the opportunity to earn permanent residency if they acquire a college degree or complete at least two years in good standing in a college program within a six year period. An honorable discharge after at least two years service in the U.S. military would also earn the young person permanent residency.

Both of these initiatives are not just fair and decent. They make economic sense.

After watching the contentious debacle of comprehensive health care reform, it’s clear a similar catch-all legislative effort to reform our broken immigration system will suffer the same fate. A comprehensive law would assuredly have something in it that everyone would hate. In the current political climate, passing such a law would not just be impossible, it would heighten already-growing tensions between Latinos and mainstream Americans.

Some in the GOP have supported AgJobs and the DREAM Act in the past. The question now will be if the same Republican legislators will act on their consciences – and for the good of the nation – or wallow in partisan politics and stonewall these initiatives simply because it will be Democrats proposing them. Let’s hope reason prevails over politics.

Raul Ramos y Sanchez 

An event not to miss

Pan American Bank has partnered with Latino Literacy Now, a non-profit corporation 501(c)(3), to host an evening of art, music, dance and literature.

Latino Literacy Now's cause, supported by Edward James Olmos, is to promote reading as a means of improving lives, both professionally and personally. Latino Literacy Now's goal is improved literacy throughout the Latino community.

The evening will feature a dance performance by Grandeza Mexicana Folk Ballet Company, readings by Latino Book & Family Festival 2010 latino authors, art gallery hosted by South Pasadena's Fremont Gallery, silent auction, door prizes, and much more!

Authors:

Lalo Alcaraz — Cartoonist
David Bueno-Hill — Fiction/Poet
Daniel Cano — Fiction
Victor Cass — Fiction
Michele Serros — Poet
Philip Victor Colón — Comic Books
Kathleen Contreras — Children’s Books
Randy Ertll - Non-Fiction
Montserrat Fontes — Fiction
Reyna Grande — Fiction
Javier Grillo-Marxuach — TV Writer/Producer
Javier Hernandez — Comic Books
Laura Lacamara — Children’s Books
René Colato Laínez — Children’s Books
Rolando Ortiz — Poet
Mike Padilla — Fiction
Melinda Palacio — Poet/Fiction
Amada Irma Perez — Children’s Books
Thelma Reyna — Fiction
Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez — Fiction

Artists:

Sergio Sanchez
Kikki Eder
Damian Chavez
Ariel Vargazal

Agenda:

4:00-4:45 pm - Music, Food, & Mingling
4:45-5:15 pm - Grandeza Mexicana Folk Ballet Company performance
5:15-5:45 pm - Welcome & Presentation of Certificates by Elected Officials
5:45-6:30 pm - Poetry Readings
6:30-7:30 pm - Book Signings
7:30-8:00 pm - Silent Auction & Closing Remarks

Emcee Armando Sanchez (Executive Director, LatinoGraduate.net)

Book booth provided by Tia Chucha's Bookstore.

Tickets: $20 per person / $30.00 per couple
RSVP: Call Reyna Grande at (323) 314-1330

ALL PROCEEDS TO BENEFIT LATINO LITERACY NOW.

LatinoGraduate.net Global Broadcasting will provide a global Webcast of the event live as well as make it available for later viewing at www.livestream.com/lsacnational.



More details here:
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=140957519248700&ref=mf#!/event.php?eid=140957519248700&ref=mf



Friday, July 23, 2010

Fear and bigotry trump economic sense

Fremont, Nebraska is a town of 25,000 that believes illegal immigration is such a problem, its citizens are willing to endure lawsuits to defend a recent law banning illegal immigrants from renting property or landing a job in the city. Is the cost of these alleged illegal immigrants to the community greater than the legal costs the city will incur defending a law that has been struck down by courts in several other cities?  Clearly, fear and bigotry can trump economic sense.


From the Wall Street Journal...

Remember Fremont, Nebraska? In June, citizens of the 25,000-person town voted in favor of banning illegal immigrants from renting property or landing a job in the town.
The law, which requires town officials to evaluate the citizenship of anyone renting property, has put the town at the center of the roiling immigration debate.
On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of landlords, tenants and employers in Fremont.
The suit claims that Fremont’s law interferes with the federal government’s authority over immigration matters and further that it has a discriminatory effect on those who look or sound “foreign.”
“This law encourages discrimination and racial profiling against Latinos and others who appear to be foreign born, including U.S. citizens,” Amy Miller, Legal Director of ACLU Nebraska, said in a statement. “We’re going to do all we can to make sure this extreme law, which would lead to individuals losing housing and jobs because of their appearance and language accent, never goes into effect.”
Here’s an article from the Fremont Tribune.
“We are reviewing the lawsuits and what they say,” Fremont City Administrator Bob Hartwig told the paper. “It will take a day or two to look at it.”
“Let’s make it clear that the unlawful parties here are the immigrants that chose to break federal and state laws by coming here illegally in the first place,” Nebraska State Sen. Charlie Janssen said in a statement.
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund also filed suit yesterday against the Fremont law, according to the Tribune. MALDEF likewise alleges the law violates the Constitution’s supremacy and equal protection clauses.



Sunday, July 11, 2010

No Talk of Vigilante Violence in Arizona

With all the talk of alleged beheadings by illegal immigrants, Governor Jan Brewer makes no mention of the case of Shawna Forde who was arrested in Pima County, Arizona in June 2009 for the murder of Raul Flores, 29, and his 9-year-old daughter. Believing Flores was a drug dealer, Forde and two other men posing as border agents entered the Flores house searching for drug money and shot everyone inside in cold blood. Raul's wife survived the shooting. Forde had formed her own group, Minutemen American Defense after being kicked out of the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps several years before. So why not a ban on the numerous vigilantes groups patrolling the border?


More details here:



Sunday, July 4, 2010

The American Revolution and Arizona's Ban on Ethnic Studies

The Fourth of July seemed an excellent time to reprise this essay...


In theory, the goal of Arizona’s new law restricting ethnic studies, HB 2281, is to promote national unity and avoid the potential for ethnic division and conflict. In reality, the effect will be just the opposite.
A government cannot dictate loyalty by fiat and coercion. That’s a lesson made all too clear by the American Revolution – a celebration of subversion taught proudly in officially-sanctioned U.S. History classes. Indeed, most of the writings of Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and other U.S. radicals would be banned under the current Arizona law.
HB 2281 bans classes that…
1. Promote the overthrow of the United States government.
2. Promote resentment toward a race or class of people.
3. Are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.
4. Advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.
The leaders of the American Revolution promoted the overthrow of their legal government. They openly resented rule by a class of unelected nobles led by King George III. Their demands for liberty were for only one ethnic group: Whites. (Blacks and Native Americans were not granted political rights or considered equals by the Founding Fathers.) Finally, the opening statement of the Declaration of Independence, “We the people…,” is an irrefutable assertion of ethnic solidarity.
The American Revolution was a classic example of a subversive movement fueled by the heavy-handed repression of the British. Do we want history to repeat itself in the U.S. Southwest? Punitive laws like HB 2281 and HB 1070 are not the way to avoid that national nightmare.
Here’s the bottom line: As a Latino, HB 2281 makes me angry. Judging by the reactions I’ve seen elsewhere, I am not alone. A huge disparity of opinion between Latinos and mainstream Americans is already forming on this issue.
Heated exchanges and charges of racism are being hurled on Internet forums, letters to the editors and radio talk shows. This law will inflame resentment among many more Hispanics across the nation than any course allegedly fostering political dissent at a community college in Arizona.
If the intent of this law is to bring Hispanics into the fold and encourage them to assimilate, it is failing miserably.
Raul Ramos y Sanchez

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Live Radio Interview Today

In the Bay Area? Hope you'll listen to my interview today at 1PM Pacific time with Jesus Orosco, host of “Alma Latina” on KKUP 91.5 FM in Cupertino, CA. We'll discuss Arizona's SB1070 and other developments foreseen in AMERICA LIBRE.

KKUP 91.5 FM
Cupertino, CA
1PM Pacific Time
Today


Friday, July 2, 2010

It's time for the voices of reason to prevail



To me, President Obama's speech was a convergence of principle and politics. The president's support for immigration reform has never been in question. Only the timing and priority of the issue have been a problem for most Latinos. Obama's support among Latinos dipped after he stated two months ago "there may not be an appetite immediately" for immigration reform. With an eye on the upcoming elections, Obama understands the importance of the Latino vote in key states. Also, the president is aware that, while most Americans say they favor Arizona's SB1070, most also believe there should be a rational path to accepting the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants.

Given these circumstances, the timing of the speech is not surprising. The announcement was a calculated political move. We would be naive to think otherwise.

Regardless of Obama's motivation, those who support immigration reform must rally behind the president. In a land quickly losing ground to bigotry, it's time for the voices of reason to prevail.

Raul Ramos y Sanchez

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Racial profiling? It's OK as long as police are not harassing me.



In this statement at the House of Representatives, Iowa Congressman Steve King defends Arizona's SB1070 by arguing that "profiling has always been a legitimate part of law enforcement." Mr. King goes on to say, "It's not wrong to use race or other indicators for the sake of identifying people that are violating the law." Mr. King ends his speech with the absurd contention that police have a "sixth sense" that enables them to detect illegal immigrants. The congressman apparently has an unbounded faith in the paranormal abilities of our law enforcement officials. That is, as long as the law they're enforcing is illegal immigration.

The Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled that Ohio police no longer need to use radar equipment to issue speeding tickets. The hue and cry from Ohio motorists was loud and predictable. "How can we give police godlike powers? They'll abuse the law," many people said. However, according to a recent Washington Post/ABC poll, 58% of Americans support Arizona's SB1070. Therefore, many of the same people who are irate at being detained on a policeman's whim are perfectly fine with giving police "godlike" powers when it comes to identifying illegal immigrants. Now here's where the irony gets really thick: Working without a visa is a civil violation, not a crime, just like simple speeding.

The human mind is capable of many kinds of sophistry to rationalize our feelings. Congressman King is voicing what many misguided Americans feel is necessary to stop illegal immigration. However, were Mr. King and most of those supporting SB1070 among the group of people who will be harassed by this law, I doubt they would be so sanguine about the possibility of racial profiling. The overwhelming majority of Latinos in the USA are here legally. Under this law, many legal residents of the United States will be continually harassed because of their appearance. That is simply wrong. 

This law may mark the beginning of a chapter in U.S. history we will later recall with shame. Stripped of its rationalizations, it smacks of the Japanese internment during WWII, the McCarthy witch hunts and the Know Nothings era, times when the rights of some Americans were trampled by a majority blinded by fear.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of AZ's SB1070 is how its support is divided along ethnic lines. The poll showed 68% of whites support the law while 69% of non-whites oppose it. This is not a good omen for the future of the nation.

Raul Ramos y Sanchez 

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Radio Interview: Immigration Issues & AMERICA LIBRE


For those who missed it live, here is a podcast of my radio interview on NPR affiliate WVXU with the host of Cincinnati Edition, Mark Perzel. Our 17-minute conversation explores how recent events like AZ's HB 1070 and similar laws are widening the gap between Latinos and the U.S. mainstream and bringing us closer to the nightmare scenario of AMERICA LIBRE.

AMERICA LIBRE Radio Interview
Originally aired Sunday, May 23, 2010
NPR affiliate WVXU
Cincinnati Edition
hosted by Mark Perzel


LISTEN TO PODCAST


Raul Ramos y Sanchez

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Arizona's ban on Latino studies will widen ethnic divisions


In theory, the goal of Arizona’s new law restricting ethnic studies, HB 2281, is to promote national unity and avoid the potential for ethnic division and conflict. In reality, the effect will be just the opposite.
A government cannot dictate loyalty by fiat and coercion. That’s a lesson made all too clear by the American Revolution – a celebration of subversion taught proudly in officially-sanctioned U.S. History classes. Indeed, most of the writings of Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and other U.S. radicals would be banned under the current Arizona law.
HB 2281 bans classes that…
1. Promote the overthrow of the United States government.
2. Promote resentment toward a race or class of people.
3. Are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.
4. Advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.
The leaders of the American Revolution promoted the overthrow of their legal government. They openly resented rule by a class of unelected nobles led by King George III. Their demands for liberty were for only one ethnic group: Whites. (Blacks and Native Americans were not granted political rights or considered equals by the Founding Fathers.) Finally, the opening statement of the Declaration of Independence, “We the people…,” is an irrefutable assertion of ethnic solidarity.
The American Revolution was a classic example of a subversive movement fueled by the heavy-handed repression of the British. Do we want history to repeat itself in the U.S. Southwest? Punitive laws like HB 2281 and HB 1070 are not the way to avoid that national nightmare.
Here’s the bottom line: As a Latino, HB 2281 makes me angry. Judging by the reactions I’ve seen elsewhere, I am not alone. A huge disparity of opinion between Latinos and mainstream Americans is already forming on this issue.
Heated exchanges and charges of racism are being hurled on Internet forums, letters to the editors and radio talk shows. This law will inflame resentment among many more Hispanics across the nation than any course allegedly fostering political dissent at a community college in Arizona.
If the intent of this law is to bring Hispanics into the fold and encourage them to assimilate, it is failing miserably.
Raul Ramos y Sanchez